http://digitalcameravideocamera.com/video-camera-compare/
HD videos on YouTube with video camera hd. Sony Veag 9. Final Cut Pro. hd fisheye lens?
I have a HDR-XR200 video camera sony with a high quality 1080p and I compared my quality video to another video that used a Sony Video Camera with 720p FX1000 top. I watched the two videos in 360p and I saw that the FX1000 seemed clearer than my video. why the video clearer than mine? we have both used fish eyes in the video. Perhaps he had a fish eye better? if so do you need a fisheye lens for Cameras HD HD? or do any work fish eyes? How can I make my video look better qualitiy? I use Sony Vegas Movie Studio 9 and the other person using Final Cut Pro and Adobe After Effects. Is there a way I can make my videos better with a setting on Veag sony? if it helps: HDR-FX1000 XR200 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwalFruSqYY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP9gt3eGFNo
The HDR-FX1000 is a miniDV tape based, semi-professional $ 3,000, Camcorder. Low compression HDV. It has a large pro-grade lens medium and large 3CMOS imaging chip. The HDR-XR200 is a hard disk drive camcorder high consumption basic quality. High compression AVCHD MTS files. Small (OK. .. medium) lens. Small chip CMOS imaging system unique. You try to compare two very different Camcorders … like trying to compare a netbook to turn a computer system – they are both computers – but that's about where the similarities end there. – You gave us some information but not enough to work with. For example, when you captured the video was the video quality on the highest quality in the camcorder? Always capture the highest quality, change to the highest quality … then export to the best quality. How is the lighting? If the lighting was good for both camcorders (ie daily), it * might * be difficult to know that with the video camera captured – if the lighting was low, then the FX1000 will win every time because of the large lens and system imaging. There is no setting in the camcorder or Vegas that can correct this problem. When the video project was exported, which parameters were used? If we had high compression and other compression stockings, low compression (smaller file size, more video scrapped lower video quality) look poor. At this stage we do not have enough information to know if it is a framework or a camcorder to export a video editor / setting process to make or something else. Try to get your consumer camcorder to have a video as the big boy is not a very good idea. Cam consumer will lose the quality of the video almost every time. Moreover, the FX1000 is capped at 1080i. HDV is the norm. If the video was shown 720p, because it and the video editing application, it has rendered. That captures 1080i or 1080p is pretty much irrelevant – most people cannot tell the difference especially after the compression is applied. +++++++++++ I just watched two videos. All the above applies … And Fast action and compression ratio does not agree. Bummer you had to learn the hard way. If you insist on capturing rapid action, then less compression is necessary. HDV AVCHD compresses less. In this case, that means the camcorder repacing – probably not an otion, so just be sure the video quality at the capture is the highest setting (HF FX, I think) and keep the compression stockings when rendering, if you can). You must also select the "deinterlace" option when rendering – and consider using a stabilizing device more often (tripod rock chair … almost anything – not just computer pocket. Consider something like a scorpion, too …
Video Camera Compare